Peer Review for Classmate Research Proposal - Peer 2 Essay

Peer Review for Classmate Research Proposal - Peer 2 - Essay exemplarPossibly, mentioning the best time period for emailing could have positively contacted the message. Moreover, the reason agrees a contradictory ancestry in paragraph two. It sounds ambiguous to discourage emailing during both working hours and non-working hours. So, when employees should sent and/or receive emails?As mention earlier, the topic is vital. The author clearly represents the proposal portraying precise sense of purpose. According to the author email communication is essential and can improve organizations effectiveness. However, due to misuse email communications impact negatively on companies and manger nonoperational assume that email communication is basic. This challenge is clearly correspond elaborated and so is the solutionNotably, the solution is kept clear there are several modes of offering the training hence leaving the manager to rationally choose the best. Notably, the author makes a commanding pass along to managers to incorporate email training in the organizations operations, by not giving any other excerpt to solve the problem. Moreover, by elaborating how training induces email etiquette, a driver of effectiveness in email communication, the solutions make a lot of sense.Forlornly, the author made the proposal sound as purely personal opinion. No sources were included in the text. Despite including the reference page, the author failed to acknowledge borrowed content and vagarys.The paper is standard, but could still make more impact if improved. Grammar mistakes were minimal and possibly negligible though they can still be corrected. To improve the papers reputation, its recommended that the author adjusts the introduction, making it more captivating. Possibly, the author might avoid generalizing the idea but instead develop an optimal amount of time to dedicate to emailing. The timing