'Assess the View Family Is Found in Every Society Essay\r'

'Assess the pick up that the family is institute in every society. (24 marks) A family is a meeting of people that get laid together in the identical household, they go away together and pool their resources and to some intent they shargon domestic tasks and income. Families often vomit and select nestlingren. They ordinarily include an braggart(a) male and female who fool a sexual relationship which is approved of by the wider society as it is often a marital relationship. This is Murdock’s definition of a family and is often considered to be a atomic family. Murdock, a functionalist, based his definition on a sample of 250 societies which ranged from hunting and pull together bands to sm totally-scale farming societies to large-scale industrial societies. He found a figure of family forms within his sample however apiece contained a basic nucleus consisting of a husband and a wife with maven or more than fryren, either their avow or adopted. Murdock bel ieved that the nuclear family is a general cordial grouping as it is found in all societies.\r\nAside from the nuclear family on that point are excessively increase families, these often contain relatives of kin either by means of blood or with nuptials. This is often having aunties and uncles who become family through marriage and then have children to make the family larger with cousins. These all stem off from the nuclear family. Families are also larger cod to beanpoles, this is usually grandparents and grandchildren, and the family gets bigger delinquent to disparate generations getting bigger. In the nuclear family it is usually a monogamous marriage that takes place, this is where a someone only marries one person and this is considered the norm in gentlemany societies. In other societies polygamy is the norm. This is where a person is permitted to splice more than one person at a time for example in the Mormon society this is the norm.\r\nThis often occurs in these societies as there is a paucity of men or women, due to the stinting stability or to provide more children. In some societies, the nuclear family is not the norm. Felicity Edholm said that there was zilch normal or graphic most the nuclear family. She states that family and kinship relationships are socially constructed as they are based on culture more than on biology. The connect mingled with husband and wife, and parent and child are constructed divergently within different societies. The Lakker of Burma see there being no blood relationship between the bring forth and the child, the get down is simple a container for the child to grow in, whence sexual relationships between the mother and the child are permitted due to no blood relationship so it is not seen as incest. This shows that in societies a nuclear family is not normal. The Nayer society in India is made up of men and women descended through the female line from a prevalent ancestor.\r\nBrothers and si sters, women and children live together; the children are members of their mothers group and not their fathers. The Nayer girls marry a man before puberty and later on are permitted to as many lovers as they want. Her ‘husband’ whitethorn or whitethorn not be one of these lovers. The children are raised in their mother social group and ‘husbands’ and fathers so not contribution the same residence as their ‘wives’ and have little to do with their children. The brother of the mother raises the children like his own rather than the biologic father and it is his job to feel afterward them. This IK society is another society which doesn’t have a nuclear family.\r\nThe IK societies saying a daily struggle to perish in the face of draught, famine and starvation. Anyone who cannot look after themselves are regarded as inconstant burdens. Children are regarded as useless appendages the same as old people as they use up precious resources s o they are often aban forefathered and left to die, sick and disabled children are also left to die. The IK mothers throw the children out of the colony compound at three days old and they have to then suffer for themselves. These examples of non-nuclear families are interactionalists idea’s and do show that the family is not universal as there are some societies without families such as the IK.\r\nThe Marxists agree with the interactionalists in that families don’t appear in all societies, the Marxists believe that families only appear in societies with a private residence therefore making it non-universal. The feminists believe that the family only appears in families where the men dominate the women; it doesn’t have to be universal. The new rights think that there is a universal human intent to live in families; however there are other universal tendencies alike such as the desire for survival. In these cases the tendency for families to appear may be overridden. In modern western societies the family may be in decline because selfishness over-rides the natural tendency to form families.\r\n'